Misrepresentation of the mandate in the Supreme Court: why it still matters
xpostfactoid.substack.com
I have made the case below piecemeal, across many posts. This is an attempt to make it as succinctly and completely as possible. --- In his oral argument against the constitutionality of the ACA's individual mandate on March 27, plaintiff's counsel Michael Carvin asserted, "Congress prohibits anyone over 30 from buying any kind of catastrophic health insurance" (p. 105).
Misrepresentation of the mandate in the Supreme Court: why it still matters
Misrepresentation of the mandate in the…
Misrepresentation of the mandate in the Supreme Court: why it still matters
I have made the case below piecemeal, across many posts. This is an attempt to make it as succinctly and completely as possible. --- In his oral argument against the constitutionality of the ACA's individual mandate on March 27, plaintiff's counsel Michael Carvin asserted, "Congress prohibits anyone over 30 from buying any kind of catastrophic health insurance" (p. 105).